[Expired]LG 27GP850-B 27” 2K Nano IPS 1ms 180Hz HDR Monitor

: You can already handle 4K gaming with that setup. 你都能上4k了

回复 @ppdgppdg : Oh, you've learned to use a search engine, huh? Why don't you see which monitors that support HDR10 and VESA DisplayHDR400 have better quality? HDR10 is an open standard that anyone can use, no certification required, just support HDR10 signal input, and you can label your product as HDR10. Meanwhile, VESA DisplayHDR requires certification from VESA. I've also shared the official website link for the standards. If you have both the 27GP850 and 27GP83B, or even if you just check the LG website, you'd know the 27GP850 clearly targets a higher-end market with lighting and USB interface, and it has gone through additional cost for VESA DisplayHDR400 certification. In contrast, the 27GP83B is cheaper because HDR10 doesn't require spending money; as long as it meets 8-bit with dithering supporting HDR signals, it can claim HDR10. As for what you found in your search, that's even funnier, "supporting 10-bit color depth and up to 1000 nits peak brightness" – you're quoting the upper limit of the standard as if it's monitor specs, right? Why don't you check the brightness of the 27GP83B? HDR10 displays are generally around 350 nits, while HDR400's peak is 400 and full-screen is 320 nits. By your logic, Dolby Vision would be miles ahead of HDR10, not only with 12-bit color depth but also higher peak brightness, but in reality? It's all about the upper limits; HDR10 products don't have lower limits and rely solely on manufacturers' integrity, whereas Dolby Vision, VESA DisplayHDR require certification so the lower limits are guaranteed. That's all I have to say, if you have any objections, let's agree to disagree and best wishes. 哟，都学会用搜索引擎了蛤，那你看看支持HDR10和通过VESA DisplayHDR400的显示器，到底谁的素质更好呢？HDR10就是个开源标准谁都可以用，不需要认证，只需要支持HDR10信号输入，就能在自己产品上标注HDR10，而VESA DisplayHDR是要给VESA做认证，硬性标准我也发了官网链接。但凡你有27GP850和27GP83B，哪怕你去LG官网看一看，都知道27GP850定位明显更高端，有灯有USB接口，还额外花钱做了VESA DisplayHDR400认证。反过来，为什么27GP83B更便宜，因为HDR10不需要花钱，满足8抖10能支持HDR信号就能打HDR10标。至于你搜索出来的就更搞笑了，“支持10位色深和高达1000尼特的峰值亮度”，拿着标准上限的亮度当作显示器参数是吧，你要不看看27GP83B亮度多少？HDR10的显示器亮度普遍350nits完事，HDR400那就是峰值要400全屏320nits。按你这逆天比法，杜比视界不是秒飞HDR10，不仅12bit色深，峰值亮度还要高，实际上呢？都是在说上限，HDR10开源做的产品没有下限全靠厂商良心，而杜比视界、VESA DisplayHDR要认证所以下限有保障。言尽于此，如有异议那就尊重祝福吧。

回复 @匿名用户 : You're the funny one, that's amateurish. HDR10 and VESA HDR 400 are two different HDR (High Dynamic Range) standards, but they have significant differences in brightness, color performance, and experience: 1. HDR10: HDR10 is a more widely adopted HDR standard, supporting 10-bit color depth and up to 1000 nits peak brightness, enabling richer colors and higher contrast. It's a content format used for video streaming, Blu-ray movies, and games, suitable for users with high demands for HDR content. 2. VESA DisplayHDR 400: This is the lowest level of HDR certification defined by VESA, requiring screen peak brightness to be at least 400 nits, which is lower than HDR10. DisplayHDR 400 typically supports 8-bit color depth (or 8-bit with dithering), so its color and contrast performance is limited. It is inferior to HDR10 in dark detail and highlights, more suited for entry-level HDR experience. Conclusion: If your goal is to watch movies, play games, or enjoy other high-quality HDR content, HDR10 will generally provide a better visual experience than VESA HDR 400, as HDR10 supports higher brightness and color depth. If it's just for everyday use and you don't specifically need extreme HDR effects, VESA HDR 400 can meet basic needs, but the overall effect will be inferior. 你才搞笑呢，太业余了。HDR10和VESA HDR 400是两种不同的HDR（高动态范围）标准，但它们在亮度、色彩表现和体验效果上有显著区别： 1. HDR10：HDR10是一种较为广泛的HDR标准，支持10位色深和高达1000尼特的峰值亮度，能够呈现出更丰富的色彩和更高的对比度效果。它是一种内容格式，用于视频流媒体、蓝光电影和游戏等场景，适合对HDR内容有较高需求的用户。 2. VESA DisplayHDR 400：这是VESA定义的最低级别的HDR认证，要求屏幕峰值亮度至少达到400尼特，相比于HDR10亮度较低。DisplayHDR 400通常支持8位色深（或8位+抖动），因此其色彩和对比度表现有限。它在暗部细节和高亮区域的表现上会逊色于HDR10，更适合入门级的HDR体验。 结论 如果你的目的是观看电影、游戏，或其他高质量HDR内容，HDR10通常会比VESA HDR 400提供更好的视觉体验，因为HDR10支持更高的亮度和色彩深度。如果只是日常使用，且不特别需要高动态范围的极致效果，那么VESA HDR 400也可以满足基本需求，但整体效果会逊色一些。

: It's quite cheap. 挺便宜

: Go for a 4K one. 买4K吧